Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 56002vsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how ISO 56002 controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

86
Controls Mapped
78
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 56002 maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 2% coverage across 37 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 164 ISO 56002 controls identifies 127 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 164 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 86 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 10: Improvement(6 mappings)

ISO-22313-10.2Continual improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
ISO-37002-10.2Continual improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
ISO-39001-10.2Continual improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
ISO-41001-10.2Continual improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
ISO-50001-10.2Continual improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement
ISO-56002-10.3Continual improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement

Clause 4: Context of the Organization(14 mappings)

ISO-22313-4.1Understanding the organization and its context2 targets
23894-5.4.1Understanding Organization and Context
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-37002-4.1Understanding the organization and its context2 targets
23894-5.4.1Understanding Organization and Context
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-39001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context2 targets
23894-5.4.1Understanding Organization and Context
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context5 targets
23894-5.4.1Understanding Organization and Context
ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system3 targets
ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria

+66 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 56002 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

ISO 56002 has 164 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 37 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 28 ISO 56002 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 56002 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 164 total ISO 56002 controls, 37 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 127 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 56002 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

127 ISO 56002 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 56002 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.