TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsISO/IEC 29134:2023

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to ISO/IEC 29134:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to ISO/IEC 29134:2023 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(5 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities5 targets
→27014-1Scope
→27014-3Terms and definitions
→29134-1Scope
→29134-3Terms and definitions
→29134-9.1PIA report structure

ISMAP Cloud Operations(1 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management
→29134-9.2Report findings and recommendations

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Spain ENS5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 29134:2023 comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO/IEC 29134:20236 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 29134:2023 covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 29134:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

6 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 29134:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.