Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsISO/IEC 27400:2022

Name: ISMAP (Japan) to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

62%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities3 targets

→27011-1Scope

→27011-3Terms and definitions

→27400-3Terms and definitions

ISMAP Cloud Infrastructure(2 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudInfrastructure-NetworkSegmentation-Container-Serverless-WorkloadProtection-Hardening-ConfigManagementISMAP Cloud Infrastructure - VPC Network Segmentation + Container/Serverless Security + Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP) + Image/Template Hardening + CIS Benchmarks + Configuration Management + IaC2 targets

→27400-6.4Default Configuration Security

ISMAP Cloud Operations(1 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management

→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response

ISMAP Data Protection(5 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM5 targets

→27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication

→27400-7.1Network Security for IoT

→27400-7.4Data retention and deletion

ISMAP Identity + Access(2 mappings)

ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM2 targets

→27400-6.1Secure Device Design

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP ASVS5 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappings ISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 718 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

3 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.