TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Indonesia PDP LawvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Indonesia PDP Law controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Indonesia PDP Law maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 60% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 Indonesia PDP Law controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Indonesia PDP Processor + Cross-Border (Art 51 + 56).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Indonesia PDP Controller Obligations (Art 20-46)(1 mappings)

IDPdp-Controller-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-PrivacyByDesign-Art20to46-Accuracy-AccountabilityIndonesia PDP Articles 20-46 + Controller Obligations + DPO Appointment + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Accuracy + Accountability + Risk Assessment + Documentation
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Indonesia PDP Enforcement + Sanctions (Art 57-73)(1 mappings)

IDPdp-Enforcement-Sanctions-Administrative-Criminal-Art56to69-DPAgency-Fine-Imprisonment-IDR6bnIndonesia PDP Articles 57-73 + Enforcement + Administrative Sanctions + Criminal Sanctions + Fines IDR Up to 6 Billion + Imprisonment Up to 6 Years + DPA Investigation + Damages Claims + Prohibitions
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Indonesia PDP Lawful Basis (Art 16-19)(2 mappings)

IDPdp-LawfulBasis-Notice-Consent-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Art16to19-ExplicitConsentIndonesia PDP Articles 16-19 + Lawful Basis + Notice + Explicit Consent + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + 6 Lawful Bases + Withdrawal + Transparency2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Indonesia PDP Marketing + Profiling(1 mappings)

IDPdp-Marketing-Profiling-DirectCommunication-Art18-OptOut-PreferenceCenter-CookiesIndonesia PDP Marketing + Profiling + Direct Communication + Article 18 Marketing Consent + Opt-Out + Preference Center + Cookies + Tracking Technologies + Behavioural Advertising
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Indonesia PDP Sensitive + Children(1 mappings)

IDPdp-SpecificData-SensitiveData-Children-Art4-Art25-Consent-COPPA-VerifiableParentalIndonesia PDP Article 4 + Article 25 + Specific Personal Data (Sensitive) + Health + Biometric + Genetic + Crime + Financial + Child + Verifiable Parental Consent + Best Interests of Child
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Indonesia PDP Training + Coord + Transition(1 mappings)

IDPdp-Training-Awareness-Coord-ASEAN-SingaporePDPA-APEC-CBPR-GDPR-Art70to76-MoCom-TransitionIndonesia PDP Training + Awareness + Indonesian Representative + Lembaga PDP Transition + Coordination ASEAN/Singapore PDPA/APEC CBPR/GDPR/India DPDP/Cross-Sectoral OJK/BI/BSSN
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other Indonesia PDP Law comparisons

Indonesia PDP Law vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs APPI7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)7 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Indonesia PDP Law and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Indonesia PDP Law has 10 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Indonesia PDP Processor + Cross-Border (Art 51 + 56), where 1 Indonesia PDP Law controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Indonesia PDP Law and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 10 total Indonesia PDP Law controls, 6 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Indonesia PDP Law to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

4 Indonesia PDP Law controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Indonesia PDP Processor + Cross-Border (Art 51 + 56) with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Indonesia PDP Law and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Indonesia PDP Processor + Cross-Border (Art 51 + 56) (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.