IFRS 17 — Insurance ContractsvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Scope and Definitions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Scope and Definitions(4 mappings)
Disclosure(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts has 22 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Scope and Definitions, where 5 IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 22 total IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls, 3 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
19 IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Scope and Definitions with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Scope and Definitions (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.