TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IEEE 1686vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how IEEE 1686 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
71%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEEE 1686 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 71% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 7 IEEE 1686 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 7 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IEEE 1686 IR + Recovery + Reporting(7 mappings)

IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills7 targets
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

IEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Access Control(2 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel2 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

IEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Log + Monitoring(1 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring
→3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity

IEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware + Config + Time + Data(5 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability5 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration

IEEE 1686 Section 6 + Supply Chain + Procurement + Physical(3 mappings)

IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

Related Comparisons

Other IEEE 1686 comparisons

IEEE 1686 vs IEC 624436 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs API 11646 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20156 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)5 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)5 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IEEE 1686 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

IEEE 1686 has 7 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (71% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications, where 1 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between IEEE 1686 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 7 total IEEE 1686 controls, 5 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 71% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEEE 1686 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

2 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEEE 1686 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.