TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IEEE 1686vsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how IEEE 1686 controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
86%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEEE 1686 maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 86% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 7 IEEE 1686 controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 7 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IEEE 1686 IR + Recovery + Reporting(4 mappings)

IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills4 targets
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
→27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing

IEEE 1686 Scope + IED + Substation(2 mappings)

IEEE1686-Scope-IED-Substation-Automation-2022-IEC-NERC-NIST-CoordIEEE 1686 - Scope + Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs) + Substation Automation + 2022 Edition + Coordination with IEC 62351 + IEC 62443 + NERC CIP + NIST SP 800-822 targets
→27010-8.2Membership Termination
→27010-8.2Membership Termination

IEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Access Control(4 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel4 targets
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

IEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Log + Monitoring(2 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring2 targets
→27010-13.1Communications Security
→27010-13.1Communications Security

IEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware + Config + Time + Data(3 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability3 targets
→27010-12.2Protection from malware
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-15.1Incident Management

IEEE 1686 Section 6 + Supply Chain + Procurement + Physical(2 mappings)

IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper2 targets
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-15.1Incident Management

Related Comparisons

Other IEEE 1686 comparisons

IEEE 1686 vs IEC 624436 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs API 11646 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)5 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)5 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27010:201510 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IEEE 1686 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

IEEE 1686 has 7 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (86% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications, where 1 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between IEEE 1686 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 7 total IEEE 1686 controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 86% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEEE 1686 to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

1 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEEE 1686 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.