IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards ManualvsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System
See exactly how IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls map to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual maps to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System with 25% coverage across 53 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 214 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls identifies 170 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Section 2: Flight Operations (FLT) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 214 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 53 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Section 5: Cabin Operations (CAB) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual(5 mappings)
Section 7: Cargo Operations (CGO) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual(4 mappings)
Section 3: Operational Control and Flight Dispatch (DSP) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual(6 mappings)
Section 2: Flight Operations (FLT) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual(5 mappings)
+33 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls your existing IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 25% in the header counts how many IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons
Other AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual has 214 controls across its framework, while AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System covers 100 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 53 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section 2: Flight Operations (FLT) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual, where 27 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls have no direct AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System equivalent.
How many controls map between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?
Of 214 total IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls, 53 map directly to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls, representing 25% coverage. The remaining 170 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?
170 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System. The highest concentration of gaps is in Section 2: Flight Operations (FLT) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?
The domain with the highest gap count is Section 2: Flight Operations (FLT) – IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.