TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System with 24% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Clause 0 – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::0.3.3Risk-based thinking2 targets
→AS9100D-6.1Risk-Based Thinking and Operational Risk
→AS9100D-6.1Risk-Based Thinking and Operational Risk

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(5 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action3 targets
→AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement2 targets
→AS9100D-10.3Continual Improvement
→ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(5 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context3 targets
→AS9100D-4.1Understanding the Organization and Its Context
→AS9100D-4.1Understanding the Organization and Its Context
→ISO27003-4.1Understanding the Organization and Its Context
iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties2 targets
→AS9100D-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
→ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(4 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment2 targets
→AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
→ISO27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities2 targets
→AS9100D-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities
→ISO27003-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
iso-22000-2018::6.3Planning of changes
→AS9100D-6.3Planning of Changes

Support – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::7.1.6Control of externally provided processes, products or services2 targets
→AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 9001:201555 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 27701:201942 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 45001:201837 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 14001:201536 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37001:201633 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37301:202132 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappings

Other AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System38 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System27 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System26 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System24 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System24 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System24 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System23 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System23 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 21 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 17 map directly to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

53 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.