Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 33% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

FedRAMP: Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters(1 mappings)

FedRAMP-BaselinesFedRAMP Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters
NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment

FedRAMP: Authorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M and System Documentation(3 mappings)

FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation3 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
NISTSP34-4Information System Contingency Plan (ISCP) Development

FedRAMP: Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests(4 mappings)

FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests2 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
FedRAMP-IncidentReportingFedRAMP incident reporting to PMO and US-CERT2 targets
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
NISTSP34-4Information System Contingency Plan (ISCP) Development

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 12 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP, where 2 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Of 12 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 4 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

8 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.