TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

GHG ProtocolvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how GHG Protocol controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GHG Protocol maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 17% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 GHG Protocol controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GHG Protocol: Coordination with SBTi + CDP + CSRD/ESRS E1 + ISSB IFRS S2 + ISO 14064 + 2024-2025 Updates.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

GHG Protocol: Scope 3 Value Chain Emissions (15 Categories, Upstream + Downstream)(2 mappings)

GHG-Scope3-Value-Chain-15CategoriesScope 3 Value Chain Emissions - 15 Categories (8 Upstream + 7 Downstream)2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-Program-Qualified-IndividualComprehensive Information Security Program + Qualified Individual (16 CFR 314.3, 314.4(a))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

GHG Protocol: Suite Overview, Corporate Standard and Reporting Principles(1 mappings)

GHG-Suite-Corporate-PrinciplesGHG Protocol Suite, Corporate Standard and 5 Reporting Principles
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other GHG Protocol comparisons

GHG Protocol vs CSRD3 mappingsGHG Protocol vs IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security2 mappingsGHG Protocol vs Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) - Net-Zero Standard1 mappingsGHG Protocol vs OWASP Top 10:20251 mappingsGHG Protocol vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)1 mappingsGHG Protocol vs OWASP ASVS1 mappingsGHG Protocol vs MITRE D3FEND1 mappingsGHG Protocol vs ICH E6(R3) - Good Clinical Practice1 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between GHG Protocol and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

GHG Protocol has 12 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GHG Protocol: Coordination with SBTi + CDP + CSRD/ESRS E1 + ISSB IFRS S2 + ISO 14064 + 2024-2025 Updates, where 6 GHG Protocol controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between GHG Protocol and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 12 total GHG Protocol controls, 2 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GHG Protocol to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

10 GHG Protocol controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in GHG Protocol: Coordination with SBTi + CDP + CSRD/ESRS E1 + ISSB IFRS S2 + ISO 14064 + 2024-2025 Updates with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GHG Protocol and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GHG Protocol: Coordination with SBTi + CDP + CSRD/ESRS E1 + ISSB IFRS S2 + ISO 14064 + 2024-2025 Updates (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.