TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing PracticevsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 36% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

GAMP 5: 2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML + Cloud + Agile + DevOps + Computer Software Assurance (CSA)(3 mappings)

GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

GAMP 5: V-Model Lifecycle and Specification Documents (URS, FS, DS, IQ, OQ, PQ)(3 mappings)

GAMP5-Lifecycle-VModel-URS-FS-DS-IQOQPQV-Model Lifecycle - URS + FS + DS + IQ + OQ + PQ + Traceability3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

GAMP 5: Risk-Based Approach, Critical Thinking and 5 Key Concepts(3 mappings)

GAMP5-Risk-CriticalThinkingRisk-Based Approach, Critical Thinking and 5 Key Concepts3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

GAMP 5: Supplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review(4 mappings)

GAMP5-Supplier-Operations-Change-PeriodicSupplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review4 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Related Comparisons

Other GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems5 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs OWASP Top 10:20254 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)4 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice vs USMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement)3 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates, where 5 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 11 total GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

7 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.