GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing PracticevsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)
See exactly how GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls map to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice maps to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) with 36% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
GAMP 5: 2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML + Cloud + Agile + DevOps + Computer Software Assurance (CSA)(2 mappings)
GAMP 5: V-Model Lifecycle and Specification Documents (URS, FS, DS, IQ, OQ, PQ)(2 mappings)
GAMP 5: Risk-Based Approach, Critical Thinking and 5 Key Concepts(2 mappings)
GAMP 5: Supplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons
Other OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice has 11 controls across its framework, while OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates, where 5 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) equivalent.
How many controls map between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
Of 11 total GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls, 4 map directly to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
7 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). The highest concentration of gaps is in GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
The domain with the highest gap count is GAMP 5: ISPE Guide Status, Copyright, GxP Regulatory Coordination and 2024-2025 Updates (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.