TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsISO 13485

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to ISO 13485 with 21% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 58 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 58 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

Incident Response and Reporting(6 mappings)

FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection3 targets
→ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Purpose, Scope and Definitions(2 mappings)

Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→6.3Information security awareness, education and training
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
→6.3Information security awareness, education and training

Safeguard Elements(11 mappings)

Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls3 targets
→ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
→ISO13485-08Information access management
→ISO13485-17Facility access controls
Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information2 targets
→ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
→ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication2 targets
→6.4Logging and Monitoring
→ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures3 targets
→ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
Sec. 314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Testing, Training and Oversight(1 mappings)

Sec. 314.4(e)Security awareness training
→ISO13485-09Security awareness and training program

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO 2701818 mappings

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 1348516 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ISO 1348514 mappingsGLI-33 - Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs ISO 1348514 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO 1348514 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO 1348513 mappingsFDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 1348513 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO 1348513 mappingsMARS-E vs ISO 1348513 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 730 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO 13485?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 58 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 12 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO 13485?

Of 58 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 12 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to ISO 13485?

46 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.