Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsISO 13485

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
37%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ISO 13485 with 37% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(6 mappings)

3.1Physical Security
8.5Control effectiveness review
3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme2 targets
6.4Logging and Monitoring
ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
3.7.1Key generation procedures3 targets
6.4Logging and Monitoring
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication

System Protection and Communications(9 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit3 targets
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
ISO13485-08Information access management
ISO13485-17Facility access controls
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection2 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest2 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity2 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
3.3.1Audit Record Creation
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
3.4Enforce Data Retention
8.5Control effectiveness review

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(2 mappings)

3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
8.5Control effectiveness review
3.2.1Account data storage minimised
ISO13485-09Security awareness and training program

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 13485?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 13485?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 13 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ISO 13485?

22 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.