Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsISO 13485

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to ISO 13485 with 24% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Security and Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(4 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
6.3Information security awareness, education and training
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training2 targets
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
ISO13485-09Security awareness and training program

Access Control and Identity Management(8 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management3 targets
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
ISO13485-08Information access management
ISO13485-17Facility access controls
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms2 targets
6.4Logging and Monitoring
ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls3 targets
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
ISO13485-08Information access management
ISO13485-17Facility access controls

Network and Communications Security(7 mappings)

AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security2 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection5 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption

System Security and Operations(1 mappings)

AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and ISO 13485?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Security and Operations, where 3 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and ISO 13485?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 9 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to ISO 13485?

28 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Security and Operations with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Security and Operations (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.