Cross-Framework Mapping

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)vsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security

See exactly how French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) maps to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security with 21% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Sapin II: Pillars 1+2 - Code of Conduct and Internal Whistleblowing System (Waserman Reform 2022)(2 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar1-Code-of-ConductPillar 1 - Anti-Corruption Code of Conduct2 targets
NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity

Sapin II: Pillars 3+4 - Corruption Risk Mapping and Third-Party Due Diligence(2 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification

Related Comparisons

Other French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) has 14 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status, where 3 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security equivalent.

How many controls map between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

Of 14 total French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

11 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.