Cross-Framework Mapping

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)vsNIST SP 800-146

See exactly how French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls map to NIST SP 800-146. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) maps to NIST SP 800-146 with 21% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Sapin II: Pillars 1+2 - Code of Conduct and Internal Whistleblowing System (Waserman Reform 2022)(1 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar1-Code-of-ConductPillar 1 - Anti-Corruption Code of Conduct
NISTSP146-1Cloud Adoption Strategy, Workload Suitability, and Decision Framework

Sapin II: Pillars 3+4 - Corruption Risk Mapping and Third-Party Due Diligence(2 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
NISTSP146-1Cloud Adoption Strategy, Workload Suitability, and Decision Framework
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
NISTSP146-1Cloud Adoption Strategy, Workload Suitability, and Decision Framework

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST SP 800-146?

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) has 14 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-146 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status, where 3 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-146 equivalent.

How many controls map between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST SP 800-146?

Of 14 total French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-146 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) to NIST SP 800-146?

11 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-146. The highest concentration of gaps is in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST SP 800-146?

The domain with the highest gap count is Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.