Cross-Framework Mapping

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)vsPCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)

See exactly how French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls map to PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) maps to PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) with 21% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Sapin II: Pillars 1+2 - Code of Conduct and Internal Whistleblowing System (Waserman Reform 2022)(2 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar1-Code-of-ConductPillar 1 - Anti-Corruption Code of Conduct2 targets
ASTWO-7Deficiency Evaluation, Material Weakness, and Communication
ASTWO-8ICFR Opinion, Basis, Definition, Limitations, Combined vs Separate Reports

Sapin II: Pillars 3+4 - Corruption Risk Mapping and Third-Party Due Diligence(4 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)2 targets
ASTWO-1Audit Planning, Scaling, Risk Assessment, and Integration
ASTWO-3Entity-Level Controls and Period-End Financial Reporting Process
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)2 targets
ASTWO-1Audit Planning, Scaling, Risk Assessment, and Integration
ASTWO-3Entity-Level Controls and Period-End Financial Reporting Process

Related Comparisons

Other French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) comparisons

Other PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)?

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) has 14 controls across its framework, while PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status, where 3 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) equivalent.

How many controls map between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)?

Of 14 total French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls, 3 map directly to PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) to PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)?

11 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct equivalent in PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR). The highest concentration of gaps is in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.