French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)vsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
See exactly how French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 29% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
Sapin II: Pillars 1+2 - Code of Conduct and Internal Whistleblowing System (Waserman Reform 2022)(2 mappings)
Sapin II: Pillars 3+4 - Corruption Risk Mapping and Third-Party Due Diligence(7 mappings)
Sapin II: Pillars 7+8 - Disciplinary Regime and Internal Monitoring and Continuous Improvement(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) has 14 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status, where 3 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.
How many controls map between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
Of 14 total French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls, 4 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
10 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.