TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 30% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(2 mappings)

ASD37-12Antivirus software with heuristics (Very Good)
→CYB-3Device Security Measures
ASD37-16Antivirus software with signatures (Limited)
→CYB-3Device Security Measures

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(2 mappings)

ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
→CYB-2Account Security Measures
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
→CYB-2Account Security Measures

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(6 mappings)

ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Recovering Data and System Availability(3 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 15 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 11 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

26 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.