TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsISO 13485

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
48
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to ISO 13485 with 18% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 56 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Risk Management(3 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis

Cybersecurity Governance(6 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→6.3Information security awareness, education and training
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
→6.3Information security awareness, education and training
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
→8.3Statement of Applicability linkage
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis

Protection and Defense(11 mappings)

OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management5 targets
→6.4Logging and Monitoring
→ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
→ISO13485-08Information access management
→ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
→ISO13485-17Facility access controls
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection5 targets
→ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
→ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
→ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
OMAN-PRO-04Security Awareness and Training
→ISO13485-09Security awareness and training program

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO 1348518 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs ISO 1348518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 1348516 mappingsNRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) vs ISO 1348515 mappingsCustoms-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) vs ISO 1348515 mappingsCIS Controls v8 vs ISO 1348514 mappingsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs ISO 1348514 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO 1348514 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 13485?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 68 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 15 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 13485?

Of 68 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 12 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 56 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to ISO 13485?

56 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.