TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) with 27% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(3 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology

Cybersecurity Governance(6 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
→SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology

Detection, Response and Recovery(1 mappings)

FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
→SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems

Protection and Defense(9 mappings)

OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management4 targets
→SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control
→SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection5 targets
→SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
→SEC-3.4Key Management

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappings

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsISO 27017 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 13 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 12 map directly to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

33 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.