TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) with 47% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology

Data Security and Privacy(6 mappings)

CSA-DATA-01Data Classification and Handling
→SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management4 targets
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
→SEC-3.4Key Management
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology

Infrastructure and Operations Security(7 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management4 targets
→SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control
→SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
CSA-INF-04Incident Management2 targets
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition
→SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)14 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs BIMCO Cyber Security12 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CAIQ (CSA)12 mappings

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsISO 27017 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 5 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 7 map directly to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

8 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.