TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility CybersecurityvsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)

See exactly how NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls map to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity maps to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) with 44% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue2 targets
→SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control
→SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management2 targets
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
→SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection5 targets
→SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
→SEC-3.4Key Management
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification3 targets
→SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud5 targets
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
→SEC-3.4Key Management
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
→SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity comparisons

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FedRAMP Rev 517 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs South Korea ISMS-P17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.016 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management16 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)16 mappings

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsISO 27017 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity has 25 controls across its framework, while CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 12 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) equivalent.

How many controls map between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

Of 25 total NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls, 11 map directly to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

14 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct equivalent in CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.