Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Data Governance Act (DGA)vsGDPR

See exactly how EU Data Governance Act (DGA) controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Data Governance Act (DGA) maps to GDPR with 26% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 EU Data Governance Act (DGA) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in DGA - Delegation, Committee, Penalties and Final (Ch VIII-IX).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 685 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 685 frameworks.

DGA - Data Intermediation Services (Ch III)(1 mappings)

DGA-Art.12Conditions for providing data intermediation services (Article 12)
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing

DGA - Data Altruism (Ch IV)(3 mappings)

DGA-Art.20_21Transparency and safeguarding requirements (Articles 20-21)2 targets
GDPR-Art.13Information to be provided where personal data are collected
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent
DGA-Art.23_24_25Competent authority + monitoring + European Data Altruism Consent Form (Articles 23-25)
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent

DGA - European Data Innovation Board and International (Ch VI-VII)(1 mappings)

DGA-Art.31International access and transfer (Article 31)
GDPR-Art.44General principle for transfers

DGA - Re-use of Protected Public Sector Data (Ch II)(3 mappings)

DGA-Art.5_6Conditions for re-use and fees (Articles 5-6)3 targets
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
Coverage crosswalk

A EU Data Governance Act (DGA) to GDPR crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which GDPR controls your existing EU Data Governance Act (DGA) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

EU Data Governance Act (DGA) into GDPR
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

GDPR into EU Data Governance Act (DGA)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

EU Data Governance Act (DGA) to GDPR (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 26% in the header counts how many EU Data Governance Act (DGA) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many GDPR controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 685 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 685 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU Data Governance Act (DGA) and GDPR?

EU Data Governance Act (DGA) has 19 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DGA - Delegation, Committee, Penalties and Final (Ch VIII-IX), where 3 EU Data Governance Act (DGA) controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Data Governance Act (DGA) and GDPR?

Of 19 total EU Data Governance Act (DGA) controls, 5 map directly to GDPR controls, representing 26% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Data Governance Act (DGA) to GDPR?

14 EU Data Governance Act (DGA) controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in DGA - Delegation, Committee, Penalties and Final (Ch VIII-IX) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Data Governance Act (DGA) and GDPR?

The domain with the highest gap count is DGA - Delegation, Committee, Penalties and Final (Ch VIII-IX) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.