TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 40% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(20 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification2 targets
→PAS1192-5-ST-01Security Triage Process
→PAS1192-5-ST-02Information Classification
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls4 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
→PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness2 targets
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)22 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)20 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 19 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 20 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

30 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.