Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vs21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(5 mappings)

DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification3 targets
CFR211-G-122Section 211.122 — Materials Examination and Usage Criteria
CFR211-G-125Section 211.125 — Labeling Issuance
CFR211-G-130Section 211.130 — Packaging and Labeling Operations
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 — Definitions
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

ICT Operations and Change Management(1 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Business Continuity Management(1 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services
CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 30 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 5 map directly to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

45 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.