TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024vs21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls map to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
79
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 maps to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice with 11% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 91 Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls identifies 81 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 91 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Personnel Security(3 mappings)

AEO-PS-2Security Awareness Training
→CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records
CTPAT-PE-1Pre-Employment Verification
→CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records
CTPAT-PE-3Education and Training
→CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Security Governance(2 mappings)

DSPF-GOV-6Security Accountability
→CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 — Definitions
PSPF-GOV-2Management Structures and Responsibilities
→CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 — Definitions

Information Security(5 mappings)

DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification3 targets
→CFR211-G-122Section 211.122 — Materials Examination and Usage Criteria
→CFR211-G-125Section 211.125 — Labeling Issuance
→CFR211-G-130Section 211.130 — Packaging and Labeling Operations
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
→CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 — Definitions
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
→CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Security Directions and Requirements(1 mappings)

PSPF-DIR-001-2024Direction 001-2024: Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence — Technology Assets
→CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Physical Security(1 mappings)

SEMD-PS-3Supply Chain Security
→CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Related Comparisons

Other Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 comparisons

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)39 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange39 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts37 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)36 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security36 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements36 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)36 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments35 mappings

Other 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice8 mappingsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice7 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 has 91 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 30 Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

Of 91 total Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls, 10 map directly to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 81 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

81 Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.