Cross-Framework Mapping

EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment ModelvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
58
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 5% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls identifies 69 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(3 mappings)

DCAM-4.1Data Governance Operating Model
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
DCAM-4.4Critical Data Element Identification
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-07Inventories of data and corresponding metadata for designated data types are maintained
DCAM-8.3Information Security and Privacy
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
Coverage crosswalk

A EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 5% in the header counts how many EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 849 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model has 61 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model, where 24 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 61 total EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls, 3 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 5% coverage. The remaining 69 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

69 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.