EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment ModelvsBCBS 239
See exactly how EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls map to BCBS 239. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model maps to BCBS 239 with 16% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls identifies 62 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
Component 3: Architecture (Business, Data and Technology) – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(2 mappings)
Component 4: Business Data Knowledge – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(2 mappings)
Component 5: Data Quality Management – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(3 mappings)
Component 6: Governance (Data and Data Management Program) – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(1 mappings)
Component 7: Data Management Operations, Risk and Control – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(2 mappings)
A EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to BCBS 239 crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which BCBS 239 controls your existing EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 16% in the header counts how many EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many BCBS 239 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model comparisons
Other BCBS 239 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and BCBS 239?
EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model has 61 controls across its framework, while BCBS 239 covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model, where 27 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls have no direct BCBS 239 equivalent.
How many controls map between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and BCBS 239?
Of 61 total EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls, 10 map directly to BCBS 239 controls, representing 16% coverage. The remaining 62 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to BCBS 239?
62 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls have no direct equivalent in BCBS 239. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and BCBS 239?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.