EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment ModelvsAustralian Government Data Governance Framework (2025)
See exactly how EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls map to Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model maps to Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) with 20% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls identifies 60 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.
Component 1: Data Strategy, Data Management Strategy and Business Case – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(3 mappings)
Component 2: Data Management Program and Funding – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(3 mappings)
Component 3: Architecture (Business, Data and Technology) – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(4 mappings)
Component 4: Business Data Knowledge – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(2 mappings)
Component 5: Data Quality Management – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(1 mappings)
Component 6: Governance (Data and Data Management Program) – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(3 mappings)
Component 7: Data Management Operations, Risk and Control – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model(1 mappings)
A EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) controls your existing EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 20% in the header counts how many EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model comparisons
Other Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 849 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025)?
EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model has 61 controls across its framework, while Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model, where 27 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls have no direct Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) equivalent.
How many controls map between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025)?
Of 61 total EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls, 12 map directly to Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025) controls, representing 20% coverage. The remaining 60 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model to Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025)?
60 EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025). The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model and Australian Government Data Governance Framework (2025)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – EDM Council DCAM - Data Management Capability Assessment Model (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.