Cross-Framework Mapping

DORAvsSOC 2

See exactly how DORA controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

81
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
92%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DORA maps to SOC 2 with 92% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 2 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 81 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(20 mappings)

DORA-Art.10Detection4 targets
→SOC2-CC6.8CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software
→SOC2-CC7.1CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
→SOC2-CC7.2CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
→SOC2-CC7.3CC7.3 Evaluating security events to identify incidents
DORA-Art.11Response and recovery4 targets
→SOC2-A1.3A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
→SOC2-CC7.4CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
→SOC2-CC7.5CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents
→SOC2-CC9.1CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption
DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery3 targets
→SOC2-A1.2A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
→SOC2-A1.3A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
→SOC2-CC6.4CC6.4 Restricting physical access to facilities and assets
DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving5 targets
→SOC2-CC1.4CC1.4 Attracting, developing and retaining competent people (COSO principle 4)
→SOC2-CC2.1CC2.1 Relevant, quality information to support internal control (COSO principle 13)
→SOC2-CC4.2CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
→SOC2-CC7.1CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
→SOC2-CC7.5CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents
DORA-Art.14Communication3 targets
→SOC2-CC2.2CC2.2 Internal communication of objectives and control responsibilities (COSO principle 14)
→SOC2-CC2.3CC2.3 Communication with external parties about internal control (COSO principle 15)
→SOC2-P6.6P6.6 Notifying breaches and incidents
DORA-Art.16Simplified ICT risk management framework
→SOC2-CC7.2CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies

+61 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The DORA to SOC 2 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing DORA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. DORA into SOC 2 lands at 37.7%, while SOC 2 into DORA lands at 46.2%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your DORA evidence buys you for SOC 2, the other asks the reverse.

DORA into SOC 2
37.7%

23 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for DORA. 38 are genuine gaps.

SOC 2 into DORA
46.2%

12 of 26 DORA controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 14 are genuine gaps.

DORA to SOC 2
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 92% in the header counts how many DORA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DORA and SOC 2?

DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (92% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing, where 2 DORA controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between DORA and SOC 2?

Of 26 total DORA controls, 24 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 92% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to SOC 2?

2 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.