DORAvsFedRAMP Moderate
See exactly how DORA controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DORA maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 100% coverage across 26 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 104 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(20 mappings)
+84 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The DORA to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing DORA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. DORA into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 11.5%, while FedRAMP Moderate into DORA lands at 42.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your DORA evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.
37 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for DORA. 286 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Access management is a named protection the entity must implement and maintain.
Grounded in DORA-Art.9 Protection and prevention. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.
Every one of the 37 evidenced controls and 286 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
11 of 26 DORA controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 15 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Reviewing and analysing audit records at least weekly is a detection process with a fixed cadence.
Grounded in AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Financial entities shall have crisis communication plans enabling responsible disclosure of major ICT-related incidents or vulnerabilities to clients, counterparts and the public as appropriate, and designate communication policies for...
Every one of the 11 evidenced controls and 15 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many DORA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DORA and FedRAMP Moderate?
DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 26 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection, where 0 DORA controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.
How many controls map between DORA and FedRAMP Moderate?
Of 26 total DORA controls, 26 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to FedRAMP Moderate?
0 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and FedRAMP Moderate?
The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.