NIS2 DirectivevsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation
See exactly how NIS2 Directive controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIS2 Directive maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 32% coverage across 26 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 80 NIS2 Directive controls identifies 54 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Other.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 80 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.
Incident Reporting(3 mappings)
Risk Management(8 mappings)
Governance(5 mappings)
Other(4 mappings)
+40 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIS2 Directive comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 768 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIS2 Directive and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
NIS2 Directive has 80 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 68 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 26 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Other, where 14 NIS2 Directive controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between NIS2 Directive and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
Of 80 total NIS2 Directive controls, 26 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 54 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIS2 Directive to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
54 NIS2 Directive controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Other with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIS2 Directive and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Other (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.