Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsNIST SP 800-172

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to NIST SP 800-172. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

87
Controls Mapped
110
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-172 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to NIST SP 800-172 with 31% coverage across 62 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 135 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 87 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(3 mappings)

CCM-A&A-02Independent Assessments3 targets
3.11.5eAssess Effectiveness of Security Solutions
3.12.1ePenetration Testing by Independent Agents
3.14.7eVerify Correctness of Security Functions

AIS - Application & Interface Security(6 mappings)

CCM-AIS-02Application Security Baseline Requirements
3.13.2eIntroduce Unpredictability into System Operations
CCM-AIS-04Secure Application Design and Development
3.13.2eIntroduce Unpredictability into System Operations
CCM-AIS-05Automated Application Security Testing
3.14.7eVerify Correctness of Security Functions
CCM-AIS-06Automated Secure Application Deployment2 targets
3.14.1eVerify Integrity of Security Critical Software and Firmware
3.4.1eAuthoritative Source for Software and Firmware
CCM-AIS-07Application Vulnerability Remediation
3.11.5eAssess Effectiveness of Security Solutions

CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management(5 mappings)

CCM-CCC-04Unauthorized Change Protection2 targets
3.14.1eVerify Integrity of Security Critical Software and Firmware
3.4.2eAutomated Detection and Remediation of Unauthorized Software
CCM-CCC-06Change Management Baseline
3.14.4eRefresh Systems and Components from a Trusted Baseline
CCM-CCC-07Detection of Baseline Deviation
3.4.2eAutomated Detection and Remediation of Unauthorized Software
CCM-CCC-09Change Restoration
3.14.4eRefresh Systems and Components from a Trusted Baseline

DCS - Datacenter Security(5 mappings)

CCM-DCS-06Assets Cataloguing and Tracking
3.4.3eAutomated Inventory of System Components
CCM-DCS-07Controlled Access Points
3.13.4ePhysical and Logical Isolation Techniques
CCM-DCS-08Equipment Identification3 targets
3.1.2eRestrict Access to Organization-Owned, Provisioned, or Issued Information Resources
3.5.1eIdentification of Systems, Components, and Devices
3.5.3eProhibit Connection of Unknown or Unverified System Components

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(1 mappings)

CCM-DSP-02Secure Disposal
3.14.5eReview Persistent Storage and Remove CUI No Longer Needed

+67 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-172 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-172 controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into NIST SP 800-172 lands at 65.7%, while NIST SP 800-172 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 14.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-172, the other asks the reverse.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into NIST SP 800-172
65.7%

23 of 35 NIST SP 800-172 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 12 are genuine gaps.

71.4%SI
57.1%RA
100%AC
100%CM
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 62 candidate mappings were examined and 2 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 3.1.1e Dual Authorization for Sensitive System Operations

Splitting duties so no one identity both performs and approves a sensitive action is dual authorization.

Grounded in CCM-IAM-04 Separation of Duties. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 3.11.1e Threat-Aware Risk Assessment

Employ threat intelligence, at a minimum from open or commercial sources and any DoD-provided sources, as part of a risk assessment to guide and inform the development of organizational systems, security architectures, selection of...

Every one of the 23 evidenced controls and 12 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-172 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
14.7%

29 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-172. 168 are genuine gaps.

28.6%STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability
33.3%CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management
15.8%DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management
23.1%HRS - Human Resources Security
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 57 candidate mappings were examined and 6 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-AIS-05 Automated Application Security Testing

Verifying correctness of security critical software by review, analysis, testing or evaluation is pre-release security testing.

Grounded in 3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Maintain approved audit and assurance policies, procedures and standards that are documented, communicated to the staff they bind, applied in practice, and reassessed at least once a year.

Every one of the 29 evidenced controls and 168 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-172
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 31% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-172 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-172?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-172 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 62 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 21 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-172 equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-172?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 62 map directly to NIST SP 800-172 controls, representing 31% coverage. The remaining 135 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-172?

135 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-172. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-172?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.