NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1vsNIST SP 800-172
See exactly how NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls map to NIST SP 800-172. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-172 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 maps to NIST SP 800-172 with 46% coverage across 87 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls identifies 104 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in C-SCRM Family: Program Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 191 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 110 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
C-SCRM Family: Access Control(8 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Awareness and Training(4 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Audit and Accountability(2 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(6 mappings)
+90 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to NIST SP 800-172 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-172 controls your existing NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 into NIST SP 800-172 lands at 62.9%, while NIST SP 800-172 into NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 lands at 21.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-172, the other asks the reverse.
22 of 35 NIST SP 800-172 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 13 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Maintains threat actor awareness and feeds it into architecture, monitoring and response decisions.
Grounded in 161R1-PM-16 Threat Awareness Program. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Employ dual authorization to execute critical or sensitive system and organizational operations affecting CUI.
Every one of the 22 evidenced controls and 13 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
41 of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-172. 150 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Secure information transfer solutions control information flows between security domains on connected systems.
Grounded in 3.1.3e Employ Secure Information Transfer Solutions. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Extends access control policy and procedure to cover suppliers, developers, integrators and service providers, and to be flowed into agreements with them.
Every one of the 41 evidenced controls and 150 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 46% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-172 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-172 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and NIST SP 800-172?
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 has 191 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-172 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 87 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C-SCRM Family: Program Management, where 18 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-172 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and NIST SP 800-172?
Of 191 total NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls, 87 map directly to NIST SP 800-172 controls, representing 46% coverage. The remaining 104 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to NIST SP 800-172?
104 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-172. The highest concentration of gaps is in C-SCRM Family: Program Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and NIST SP 800-172?
The domain with the highest gap count is C-SCRM Family: Program Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.