TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
37%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 37% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Account Security(5 mappings)

CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials3 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation

Data Security(5 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection2 targets
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage2 targets
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Governance & Training(3 mappings)

CPG-4.BOT Cybersecurity Leadership
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training2 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms

Governance and Training(3 mappings)

CPG-4.BOT Cybersecurity Leadership
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training2 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms

Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program
→AWWA-4.2Patch Management

Supply Chain and Third Party(1 mappings)

CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Response & Recovery(1 mappings)

CPG-7.BIncident Response Plans
→AWWA-4.1Malware Protection

Network Segmentation(1 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework12 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsSLSA vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsPTES vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 15 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

24 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.