CIS Controls v8vsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)
See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CIS Controls v8 maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 9% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 139 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Application Software Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.
Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets(3 mappings)
Malware Defenses(1 mappings)
Data Protection(7 mappings)
Access Control Management(3 mappings)
Email and Web Browser Protections(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other CIS Controls v8 comparisons
Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 768 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?
CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Application Software Security, where 14 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.
How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?
Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 14 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 139 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?
139 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in Application Software Security with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Application Software Security (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.