Cross-Framework Mapping

CIS Controls v8vsSWIFT CSCF

See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to SWIFT CSCF. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

55
Controls Mapped
98
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CIS Controls v8 maps to SWIFT CSCF with 14% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 132 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Application Software Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 55 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets(3 mappings)

1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
3.1Physical Security
1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control
SWIFT-CSCF-05Roles and responsibilities definition
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection
SWIFT-CSCF-05Roles and responsibilities definition

Malware Defenses(2 mappings)

10.2Risk reporting2 targets
1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
3.1Physical Security

Data Protection(15 mappings)

3.1Physical Security4 targets
1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
4.1Password Policy
4.2Multi-Factor Authentication
7.1Cyber Incident Response Planning
3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory3 targets
4.1Password Policy
4.2Multi-Factor Authentication
7.1Cyber Incident Response Planning
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists3 targets
1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection
SWIFT-CSCF-05Roles and responsibilities definition
3.4Enforce Data Retention4 targets
3.1Physical Security
4.1Password Policy
4.2Multi-Factor Authentication
7.1Cyber Incident Response Planning
3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
SWIFT-CSCF-12Disaster recovery procedures

+35 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 769 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and SWIFT CSCF?

CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while SWIFT CSCF covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Application Software Security, where 14 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct SWIFT CSCF equivalent.

How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and SWIFT CSCF?

Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 21 map directly to SWIFT CSCF controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 132 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to SWIFT CSCF?

132 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in SWIFT CSCF. The highest concentration of gaps is in Application Software Security with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and SWIFT CSCF?

The domain with the highest gap count is Application Software Security (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.