TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements with 33% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(6 mappings)

38.1051(c)BC-DR Planning
→RTS 4.18Backup and recovery
38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives4 targets
→RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RTS 4.18Backup and recovery
→RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
38.1051(c)(2)Geographic Separation of Backup
→RTS 4.18Backup and recovery

Systems Development and Physical Security(2 mappings)

38.1051(e)(1)Change Management
→RTS 4.21Secure development and change management
38.1051(f)Physical Security Controls
→RTS 4.11Equipment protection

Cybersecurity Testing(1 mappings)

38.1051(h)(4)Security Incident Response Plan Testing
→RTS 4.5Incident management

Information Security(11 mappings)

DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls3 targets
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
→RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls
→RTS 4.8Employment screening and termination
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security3 targets
→RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring2 targets
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.22Network security
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness
→RTS 4.7Security awareness training
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security2 targets
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
→RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)25 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange24 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)24 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202424 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 522 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappings

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPCI DSS v4.0 vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 23 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 16 map directly to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

33 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.