TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk ManagementvsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements

See exactly how Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls map to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management maps to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements with 67% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management Lifecycle(4 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-RM-02Authorisation to Operate2 targets
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.22Network security
CA-ITSG33-RM-03Continuous Monitoring2 targets
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.22Network security

Security Controls(16 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue3 targets
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
→RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls
→RTS 4.5Incident management
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→RTS 4.5Incident management
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security2 targets
→RTS 4.11Equipment protection
→RTS 4.22Network security
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection4 targets
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.20Cryptography
→RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→RTS 4.16Authentication mechanisms
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs3 targets
→RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
→RTS 4.21Secure development and change management
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs
→RTS 4.4Supplier relationship security

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management comparisons

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FedRAMP Rev 517 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs South Korea ISMS-P17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)16 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges16 mappings

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPCI DSS v4.0 vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management has 24 controls across its framework, while UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 7 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls have no direct UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

Of 24 total Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls, 16 map directly to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

8 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.