TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
51%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements with 51% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(13 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection3 targets
→RTS 4.11Equipment protection
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
→RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
→RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup4 targets
→RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RTS 4.18Backup and recovery
→RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→RTS 4.20Cryptography
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→RTS 4.20Cryptography
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→RTS 4.20Cryptography

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(6 mappings)

3.12Security Assessment and Monitoring2 targets
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.22Network security
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance3 targets
→RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring

Incident Response and Media Protection(1 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
→RTS 4.4Supplier relationship security

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPCI DSS v4.0 vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 9 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 18 map directly to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls — representing 51% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

17 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.