Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 31% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(16 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection
GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
TSSR-INFO-2Stored Communications Security
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
TSSR-INFO-3Lawful Interception Capability
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(4 mappings)

38.1051(c)BC-DR Planning2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery
RBI-CYB-GOV-03Cyber Crisis Management Plan
38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 25 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 15 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

34 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.