Cross-Framework Mapping

NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 29% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(20 mappings)

EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM5 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting4 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) has 41 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 29 NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 41 total NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls, 12 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

29 NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.