Cross-Framework Mapping

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

37
Controls Mapped
55
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 23% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 92 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls identifies 71 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 92 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(16 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection
GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
TSSR-INFO-2Stored Communications Security
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
TSSR-INFO-3Lawful Interception Capability
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight

Personnel Security(4 mappings)

AEO-PS-2Security Awareness Training
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
CTPAT-PE-1Pre-Employment Verification
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
CTPAT-PE-3Education and Training
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
PSPF-PERS-4Separation and Transfer
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery

+17 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) has 92 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 25 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 92 total Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls, 21 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 71 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

71 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.