Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food with 32% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(8 mappings)

BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
2.5.2Verification Activities
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT2 targets
2.2.2Records
MC-1Senior Management Support
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
2.5.2Verification Activities
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology2 targets
2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
PBD-IMP-03Organisational Integration
2.5.2Verification Activities

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 10 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 6 map directly to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

13 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.