Cross-Framework Mapping

US OFAC Sanctions Compliance FrameworkvsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food

See exactly how US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls map to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework maps to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Management Commitment(6 mappings)

2.1.1Management Policy2 targets
2.1.2Management Responsibility
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
2.1.2Management Responsibility2 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture2 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.2Management Responsibility

Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

DMF-4.1Impact Assessment2 targets
2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment2 targets
2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
RA-1Security Risk Assessment2 targets
2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan

Testing and Auditing(1 mappings)

TA-3Remediation of Findings
2.2.2Records

Training(3 mappings)

TR-1Periodic Training Program
MC-1Senior Management Support
TR-2Job-Specific Training
MC-1Senior Management Support
TR-4Training Updates
MC-1Senior Management Support

Related Comparisons

Other US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework comparisons

Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework has 35 controls across its framework, while SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 10 US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls have no direct SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food equivalent.

How many controls map between US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

Of 35 total US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls, 10 map directly to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

25 US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls have no direct equivalent in SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.