AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food
See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food with 37% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership (Clause 5).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(2 mappings)
Context of the Organisation (Clause 4)(6 mappings)
Leadership (Clause 5)(4 mappings)
Planning and Support (Clauses 6–7)(3 mappings)
Operation (Clause 8)(5 mappings)
+7 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership (Clause 5), where 8 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food equivalent.
How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?
Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 14 map directly to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?
24 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership (Clause 5) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?
The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership (Clause 5) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.