Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 24% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Clause 0 – ISO 22000:2018(1 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::0.3.3Risk-based thinking
AS9100D-6.1Risk-Based Thinking and Operational Risk

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(6 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action3 targets
27003-10.1Nonconformity and Corrective Action
AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement3 targets
27003-10.2Continual Improvement
AS9100D-10.3Continual Improvement
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(5 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context3 targets
27003-4.1Understanding the Organization and Its Context
AS9100D-4.1Understanding the Organization and Its Context
ISO27003-4.1Understanding the Organization and Its Context
iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties2 targets
AS9100D-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(6 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment3 targets
27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities3 targets
27003-5.3Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities
AS9100D-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities
ISO27003-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities2 targets
27003-6.1.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 72 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 21 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 17 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

53 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.